Lawmakers appear to be tentatively dividing into four camps over military action in Syria; 1) AGAINST Military Action, 2) LEANING NO, 3) UNDECIDED and, 4) FOR Military Action. The Washington Post is tracking House and Senate members positions. Read more at the Washington Post...
As of Sept. 12th:
- Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR First District): Leaning NO
- Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR Second District): AGAINST - “Absent a direct threat to the United States or our allies and a clear goal and definition of victory, I must oppose using military force in Syria.”
- Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR Third District): UNDECIDED
- Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR Fourth District): AGAINST - “This situation is incredibly fluid, but I currently do not support an open-ended, ill-defined intervention in another civil war.”
- Rep. Curt Schrader (D-OR Fifth District): AGAINST - “...direct U.S. military involvement at this time is one of the worst of many bad options.”
- Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR): UNDECIDED
- Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR): UNDECIDED
.jpg)
0 comments:
Post a Comment