Showing posts with label czars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label czars. Show all posts
Friday, December 18, 2009
The Healthcare bill would be Obama's "Enabling Act"
GRAND OLD PARTISAN BLOG, 12/17/2009 by Michael Zak - Why are Barack Obama and other Democrat leaders so intent on passing a government takeover of healthcare now Now NOW? Read Mr. Zak's historical account of the "Enabling Act"...
Read More......
Sunday, August 30, 2009
The New Republic: America's Future Recap
GLENN BECK, 8/24-28/2009 - All week on radio and TV Glenn asked the tough questions -- because our republic is being transformed before our very eyes. The time for silent dissent has long passed, and now the hard questions need to be asked. Maybe there are perfectly logical explanations for Obama's 'Civilian National Security Force' he wants funded as well as the military. But what is it? Who are the radical Czars in the White House, and why are they there? Does the President actually listen to Communist ideas? Here is the ENTIRE RECAP of this weeks shows -- the monologues, the questions, the amazing interview with Rush Limbaugh and more. Please, read it and pass it around to all of your friends. These questions need to be asked and answered. Get started! Read more at GlennBeck.com...
Read More......
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Obama's 32 Czars
WASHINGTON POST, 7/30/2009, by Eric Cantor - Too Many Presidential Czars Keep Congress in the Dark. "The biggest problems that we're facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all. And that's what I intend to reverse when I'm president of the United States." -- Sen. Barack Obama, March 31, 2008
To say President Obama failed to follow through on this promise is an understatement. By appointing a virtual army of "czars" -- each wholly unaccountable to Congress yet tasked with spearheading major policy efforts for the White House -- in his first six months, the president has embarked on an end-run around the legislative branch of historic proportions. Read more at the Washington Post...
Hat tip: John H. Detweiler
John writes, "Nixon was criticized for having an imperial presidency but as I
remember, his imperialness was trappings, not czars." Read More......
To say President Obama failed to follow through on this promise is an understatement. By appointing a virtual army of "czars" -- each wholly unaccountable to Congress yet tasked with spearheading major policy efforts for the White House -- in his first six months, the president has embarked on an end-run around the legislative branch of historic proportions. Read more at the Washington Post...
Hat tip: John H. Detweiler
John writes, "Nixon was criticized for having an imperial presidency but as I
remember, his imperialness was trappings, not czars." Read More......
Labels:
Congress,
czars,
national,
Obama,
unaccountable
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







.jpg)
