"Words mean what they say," I wrote in my Washington Examiner column one week ago. But, as I added, not necessarily to a majority of justices of the Supreme Court. The targets of my column were the majority opinions in King v. Burwell and Texas Department of Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project. --In King v. Burwell, Chief Justice Roberts interpreted the words "established by the state" in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) as meaning "established by the state or the federal government," even though the law itself defines "state" as the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Read more at Townhall.com
(Hat tip: KimR)
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Redistricting Not Worth the Verbal Footwork
Labels:
Arizona,
redistricting,
Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment