The Amsterdam-based InterAcademy Council (IAC), a scientific body asked to audit UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) procedures, has determined the IPCC has improperly crossed the line of policy advocacy, is not transparent enough, is prone to conflicts of interest, and has made numerous alarmist assertions that are not supported by the scientific record. IAC recommends structural reforms to fix IPCC’s flaws before IPCC’s next report, due in 2014.
The Heartland Institute for years has led criticism of the IPCC’s determination to put politics over scientific rigor to promote the dubious theory of man-made global warming. Heartland has hosted four international climate conferences, established the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), and produced and distributed millions of copies of reports, videos and books – including the 800-page Climate Change Reconsidered, the only comprehensive critique of the latest IPCC report, published in 2009.
For more information contact Tammy Nash or Jim Lakely at 312/377-4000. --Heartland Institute
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Heartland Institute: Audit of IPCC Procedures ‘a Vindication’ but ‘Too Modest'
Labels:
climate science,
critique,
Global Warming,
Heartland Institute,
IPCC,
politics,
U.N.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment